Control Risks reviews about "team"

Very regionalised business , struggling to have global view for clients; executive team (apart from 2) have not worked in senior positions in other organisations and so lack strategic leadership - still very reactive and tactical. With proper investment could have a business twice the size and twice as profitable.

Boring office culture, bad pay

Very bad management leaders, unrealistic targets and expectations from employees which cannot be achieved practically and they put too much of pressure on teams. Very bad negative work culture, no flexible working. Mechanical working pattern. The team that i have worked with was extremely arrogant, blunt and rough. Had an extremely bad experience, would not recommend at all.

It sometimes feels like budgetary restraints are never ending, from managers being unable to hire the candidates they want, to investment in software that would make work easier for a large group, being able to take a team on a nice lunch etc. Some people, managers in particular, might find the constant 'no' response to requests involving financial input frustrating / demotivating.

- It's still a security company first and foremost: the other parts of the company do have to play second-fiddle, receive less management attention accordingly, and the business will always chase the fat physical security contracts first, often to the detriment of the other business lines, its own reputation, and frequently confusing large revenues with small margins - This is also reflected in a management structure in which "old(er) white men" are still massively over-represented, and a services background and time spent in "dangerous places" are both more highly prized than business acumen - This in turn leads to a steady exodus of talented mid-level staff, who simply cannot see long-term opportunities when the same old/entrenched faces are likely to continue to fill the upper roles forever - regardless of how well they actually perform - The company's strong market position, and the neverending shortage of geopolitical crises and criminal actions boosting its sales - as well as the absence of anyone from outside the privately-owned company really asking the management team any difficult questions - make it a little lazy and complacent. The sales and marketing functions are both way weaker than they should be as a result, reflecting a belief that "the clients will come to us; we don't have to go to them", enabling inferior competitors to take away more business than they really should - Standards of output can vary by location and function; the company's heavily regional model does lead to different parts of the business competing with each other rather than collaborating, and doing things for clients that would probably be best done by others elsewhere

There is no discrimination in the company among the staff

Poor management, lack of real expertise, sales focus, not family friendly, inconsistent goals that change with changes in leadership, poor staff retention, brain drain. I did not feel I learned that much from the people I worked with, there was very much a "work it out for yourself" mentality.

Night shifts were a killer.