Pearson Associate Editor reviews

3.2

45% would recommend to a friend

(83 total reviews)
avatar

Omar Abbosh

18% approve of CEO

43% positive business outlook

Associate Editor employees have rated Pearson with 3.2 out of 5 stars, based on 83 company reviews on Glassdoor. This indicates that most Associate Editor professionals have a good working experience there. Pearson is rated in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) by Associate Editor professionals compared to other employers within the Audiovisual y medios de comunicación industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

83 reviews
3.0
Jan 12, 2010
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good health benefits (including dental, vision), laid-back atmosphere (casual), flexible schedule, overall nice people, monthly online development courses, volunteering opportunities...

Cons

People with one year contracts are expected to work over time up to a ridiculous point, including weekends and nights, as if they had a stake in the company. A major issue is the unrealistic deadlines. Top management assigns unachievable assignments to temporary employees without training them, but employees are expected to devote their life to the project. When the project does not get done, the editors take are blamed, but the big picture is the the company lacks staff. When the morale is low and people's contracts are almost over, some employees stop working altogether. Management has not figured out how to deal effectively with this problem.

4.0
Sep 2, 2009
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Low stress work environment. Very friendly and supportive.

Cons

Term of project positions, TOPs, are exactly that. Most low to mid level positions always start as these contract positions. It is the pathway to becoming a permanent staff member, but budgets often stand in the way. You are strung along for a year or two and then can easily be shown the door.

2.0
Jan 24, 2009
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The benefits were decent and there was a certain autonomy allowed in my work as a project manager.

Cons

Despite being a solid employee--I was given the overflow work from other PMs because I could work more efficiently than some, and I was also given the more complicated projects because I could manage them thoroughly and under tight deadlines--I was stymied whenever I attempted to discuss the possibility of moving up. AND, regardless of my good work, I received only the same 3% raise as everyone else at my level. Hard work was NOT rewarded, there was no reason for anyone to attempt to be more than mediocre. And when I left, they didn't even open a discussion of trying to get me to stay. I never felt valued, and I wasn't the only one. Turnover was high, and the best people were the first to leave when they realized they were going to get nowhere by staying.

Viewing 79 - 81 of 83 Reviews

Glassdoor has 9,536 Pearson reviews submitted anonymously by Pearson employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Pearson is right for you.