Hearst reviews

3.6

65% would recommend to a friend

(1,451 total reviews)

Steven R. Swartz

76% approve of CEO

50% positive business outlook

Hearst has an employee rating of 3.6 out of 5 stars, based on 1,451 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Hearst employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Audiovisual y medios de comunicación industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

1K reviews
5.0
Sep 24, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

for such a a big corp, surprising willingness coming from the top down to experiment and innovate in terms of the digital strategy. always learning something new. flexibility with working at home. very smart, motivated people to learn from. constantly implementing the latest and greatest technologies. great benefits and salary. hard work and honesty wins respect. agile methodology works well in my department. good team energy, good mix of people.

Cons

this doesn't really apply to me, but, a warning to others in the tech/IT areas - this is not a job for wallflowers. you're expected to do your homework and have an opinion and self-motivate to keep up to speed with latest ideas and innovations. it's more than hiding behind a computer screen, so not a job for the lazy or intellectually uninterested developer. if you don't know how to do something, you're expected to figure it out.

1.0
Sep 21, 2014

Reality doesn't live up to the hype

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Cafeteria is nice, the Tower is beautiful piece of architecture.

Cons

The reality is that magazines and newspapers are dying industries. The company was at least smart enough to invest in other industries/companies which basically fund those two black holes. So if you opt to work in the newspaper or magazine divisions, be prepared to be nicked and dimed on everything. Extremely low pay increases and no bonuses. They cut staff regularly, but don't do it in a smart way. Cliques abound, and if you sell your soul and become a sycophant, then you might do well here. They rarely promote based on ability/performance but more on how much you suck up to certain executives. There is one executive in particular who has gotten multiple complaints to HR on said executive's management style (one of condescension, verbal abuse, little to no communication), but remains at this company. That alone should tell you that Hearst is blind to how its teams operate, and what it takes to run an effective organization. Run, don't walk away from this company.

2.0
Apr 22, 2012
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

If you're interested in the New York dream of working in a glamorous workplace filled with beautiful people in a very sleek skyscraper, this is a good place to come, but don't expect much more.

Cons

The Hearst tower is home to the editorial and business offices of many national publications, primarily fashion magazines, including Cosmopolitan, Seventeen, Marie Claire, Esquire, and Town & Country. If you're looking for a career as a writer, this is NOT the environment to come to. Print media has had its paid jobs drying up for the past decade as people move online to consume their favorite titles. As a result, only the cattiest of the cutthroat can survive at a place like Hearst. With all the fashion magazines housed in the building, the people are very glamorous and investing heavily in personal style is unfortunately a serious work expense in a company like this. The culture trickles into every office in the building. There is a rotating cast of writers that find their way into gigs at Hearst, and this is by design. With print media dying and ad sales plummeting, as well as the general economic downturn, a number of years ago Hearst began employing outside agencies to fill all the entry to mid-level editorial and sales positions inside the company. This was a means of cutting costs to avoid paying any benefits to these workers, by making their tenure at Hearst a temporary arrangement, subject to termination at any time. This works out well in a company whose publications thrive on spotting trends and "taste-making". The cyclical temporary employees are basically "auditioned", so to speak for an editorial position. They are paid hourly to pitch ideas for stories, proofread, or suggest new designers and pieces of perfumes to review. Their personal fashion sense and their compatibility with the corporate culture is tested during this period. As a result, all of these staff members are forced to compete with each other to prove themselves for a long-term tenure or (gasp!) a permanent position. Typically, each publication in Hearst has only a handful of permanent staff (at least for the past 5 or 6 years), with all the remaining work, creative or otherwise, performed by the aspirants. Unfortunately, this naturally leads to a very cutthroat and tense work environment. Everyone there's seen the Devil Wears Prada, and unfortunately that movie is not dissimilar to the experience that many fresh college grads encounter when they come to Hearst. I worked at Hearst for three years, and I was lucky enough to have "made the cut", and held permanent positions in a few of the publications there. For those considering employment at Hearst, it is not for the faint of heart nor the thin-skinned, and the professional culture was by far the most competitive and snobbiest I've ever experienced in my adult life.

Viewing 19 - 21 of 1,451 Reviews

Glassdoor has 1,767 Hearst reviews submitted anonymously by Hearst employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Hearst is right for you.