UserTesting reviews about "upper management"

53% positive business outlook

Reviews by job title

11 reviews
2.0
Apr 16, 2015

Awesome coworkers; inexcusably bad management practices.

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The lower-level employees are great people. I made good friends here. It's a way to get your foot into the tech industry.

Cons

The company suffers from serious issues: nepotism, favoritism, and sexism. Forcefully oppressive cultures exist in many departments. Sexual harassment is prominent in the SF office - my personal experience with this is one of the reasons I left the company. Employees are overworked, yet underpaid and undervalued, especially on the Research Team, which provides the core service for the company. Compensation is off by tens of thousands of dollars for many roles. Most people in upper management were brought in for their resumes or through nepotism, not for their skills or abilities. Managers at this level tend to be hypocritical and unaccountable. They have no respect for an employee's time, regularly canceling one-on-ones and check-ins without notice. The founders are nice, but seem to be largely unaware of the mistreatment of lower level employees. Initiative is not rewarded; it is more likely to be punished. Never do anything on "good faith" for this company, you will regret it. The most unfortunate thing about the whole situation at UserTesting is that there is NO trustworthy HR presence, so there is really no reason for managers to conduct themselves properly.

3.0
Mar 18, 2020

Good company

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great culture Good work environment

Cons

Better directions from upper management

1.0
Dec 8, 2025

I'm not mad, I'm disappointed.

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Adored most of the people I worked with day-to-day - Flexible PTO and flexible hours (US Employees) - The company once stood for something, was run by decent people, and had a great culture.

Cons

- No growth opportunities, but they'll demote your title and then tell you its just semantics - Constant instability and threat of layoffs. - Upper management is not interested in any critical feedback. - Gaslighting. Everything is great and if you don't think its great its your fault. - The CEO spoke on all hands meeting like we were a company of idiots. From what I've heard, that hasn't changed. Also we get it you're rich.

5.0
Dec 25, 2014

Best Company I Have Worked For !!

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

1) The people. Overall an amazing group of very intelligent, kind and hardworking people. I can not stress how kind hearted and wonderful the people in this company are. 2) Great upper management. C level executives are absolutely amazing and a pleasure to work for. They seek employee feedback and actually listen. Action is taken within a reasonable amount of time to alleviate concerns. 3) Career growth opportunities. There's lots of growth for those who know how to find it. You'll notice there's been movement between departments for those who know where their interests are and have put in the work to prove their worth. 4) Increase of perks: snacks, coffee trucks, lunches, dinner, onsite massages, dog-friendly office, and flexibility to work remotely when needed (benefits are improving as well)

Cons

1) Compensation is low for certain positions regardless of the effort, time and value put in. 2) Disconnect between the SF and MV offices.

1.0
Feb 13, 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

A lot of us have become good friends, which is one of two reasons I haven't quit yet. In fact, it's one of the biggest reasons most of us are still here. Those who suffer together... The other reason I haven't quit yet is because there's some flexibility (depending on your direct manager) with working from home - which is always a savior on the sanity front. Dog friendly!

Cons

CSMs get judged on a LOT of metrics, and are constantly hounded when one of them drops. It's unreasonable to be expected to respond to e-mails within 2 hours AND reach out to all customers at least once every two week with proactive & strategic material AND take care of all project management AND attend all the internal meetings AND conduct quarterly business reviews with all your customers - who by the way, don't actually want to do because they're also busy - AND everything else. There's only so many things you can work on if you want to keep your sanity and not work 15-hour days. Too many internal meetings. Granted, not all of them are explicitly mandatory, but management notices when you don't attend and you get verbally berated anyway. CSMs are the *only* people in the company who get "rated" by at least 5 different other teams in the company, and by customers as well. It's a lot of pressure to keep all of those ratings up. Ever since they created the Customer Operations Manager role to manage the CSMs, there's been a *lot* of micromanaging. When things go wrong, upper management demands to know what *YOU* did wrong. Yes, sometimes, it's our fault. But sometimes, failure is inevitable and instead of being asked why we failed and how we should handle it in the future, it would be much better for morale to show empathy, put them in our shoes and see how difficult it is. Speaking of which, a lot of customers are *not* suitable for our platform and services, but they get sold - and often times oversold - anyway, and then CSMs have to deal with them for a whole year. You basically get set up for failure. When researchers mess up on a study (or multiple studies) it's also your responsibility, even though it's not your job to do research, because your supposed to know everything - and I mean EVERYTHING - about the customer, so nothing should have gone wrong. Internal tools are a pain to use and when we make product requests, it's hard to get them pushed through. Big changes happen often and without your input. They recently hired an exec who has caused a lot of friction/drama with people, turned the Customer Success team into sales - essentially, and just gives off a really inauthentic aura that makes most of us uncomfortable. He comes from a very corporate background, which stuck to him, and doesn't mesh with our company culture. And while he claims that he knows how miserable we are (which everyone seems to have noticed, and obviously not a good sign), nothing he's done so far as shown us that he actually cares. In fact, he doesn't take feedback well at all - after starting at UT, he created an account manager role called Customer Growth Executives, which the majority (if not all) of CSMs (and even CGEs) did not feel comfortable with, because it gave the impression that they were there to increase the dollar amount of contracts - which is true, but he meant for it mean that CGEs were there to support the customer and grow their business. After almost all the CSMs and CGEs said they felt like it meant increasing the dollar amount of the contract and were therefore using the title of "Account Manager' instead, he ignored us all and "decided" that it was going to be CGE. Pay is not up to par with the industry standard. When some of us raised this concern, upper management told us that when Client Success Coordinators became CSMs, it was due to an internal reorg and not an actual promotion - which is true, *however* that internal reorg also gave us at least twice the amount of work, so the slight increase in our salary was not justifiable and STILL below industry standard. These are just *some* of the things that are driving CSMs crazy - and away from the company itself.

1.0
Apr 11, 2019

Dreadful and tiring

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Colleagues are great and we always try to lift eachother up

Cons

Morale is dropping and upper management keeps letting people go so now people are leaving on their own as well. I don't see a future here anymore and I don't know where the company is going. It seems like it's becoming more 'sales ' and no one cares about the professional service group anymore. Everyone just keeps working hard for nothing so its dreadful and tiring to go to work now. Some people on the PM team doesnt even know what they are doing anymore, morale is at an all time low.

avatar
UserTesting Response
7y
Thank you for being open in your review. I've shared this with the best people on the team to work with you and look at what happened. We're sad that the changes made impacted you and your team this way.
2.0
Feb 4, 2015

great potential, spoiled by subversive politics and top-down policies

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- My peers at UserTesting are some of the most intelligent and inspired people I've ever had the privilege of meeting. - The product and services that UserTesting offers are nothing short of inspired. - The founders are exceptionally kind and creative people.

Cons

Company politics are a factor in just about any workplace, but so few organizations are as strictly governed by them as UserTesting. While upper management is comprised of only a handful of individuals, they've established a precedent in which feedback is appreciated (but only the 'right' kind), advancement is possible (but only if you're a relative or a buddy of theirs), and employees can distinguish themselves (but only through unreasonably long hours). The c-suite's reluctance to promote from within the company remains prevalent throughout the workplace. In the few instances where opportunities do arise they are almost immediately gifted to the manager's favorite worker rather than the one who was most qualified. This issue would be less relevant if the compensation were adequate, if bonus work was rewarded, and if growth opportunities were present - however given that the average workweek ranges anywhere between 50-70 hours (6am calls and weekend hours included) and that the salary is barely livable, the whole politics-pill becomes a bit too hard to swallow. It also should be noted, to the merit of UserTesting, that hostility within the company is greatly discouraged. However if the issue pertains to a manager's misconduct or abuse of power, then HR is entirely unresponsive, if not occasionally duplicitous in their approach. This brings me to the issue of trust: at UserTesting, the rift between management and employees only grows as bottom-up feedback becomes irrelevant (ironic for a feedback driven business model). This results in very little communication between the various departments, (both to one another and internally) and sadly makes any change a slow and tedious process.

avatar
UserTesting Response
10y
I'm the CEO of UserTesting and though I'd like to respond to the issue of management-employee communications by pointing out that: > We anonymously survey our employees every quarter and there is no responses that would correlate with this review. > I meet one-on-one with every employee on an on-going basis to find out how people are doing and what problems they're seeing.
4.0
Dec 6, 2021

On the way to 5 Stars

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Amazing colleagues, fantastic product, excellent upper management, and work-life balance.

Cons

Pay isn't competitive; upper management needs more diversity, especially persons of color, primarily Black and Hispanic.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 11 Reviews

Glassdoor has 806 UserTesting reviews submitted anonymously by UserTesting employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if UserTesting is right for you.