T-Systems reviews

3.7

74% would recommend to a friend

(2,261 total reviews)
avatar

Dr. Ferri Abolhassan

72% approve of CEO

59% positive business outlook

T-Systems has an employee rating of 3.7 out of 5 stars, based on 2,261 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The T-Systems employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Tecnologías de la información industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

2K reviews
1.0
Jun 4, 2019

Too much politics and biased behavior by management

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Since this company started 3 years back, they are hiring aggressively so offering good packages to people who can join early

Cons

1. Politics by Management. Incompetent people are being made to lead teams because of their contacts 2. The management is incompetent hence attracting incompetent people in the teams so that they do not raise voice 3. Managers doing what ever they want. People who do not have understanding of the role are being made to take interviews and are asked to face the internal clients 4. No importance to knowledge and intelligence. Appraisals are given on the basis of contacts and how good you can lick the boots 5. No processes. Good people join and leave within 5-6 months 6. Negative atmosphere.

avatar
T-Systems Response
6y
Dear Colleague, there are T-Systems companies in different parts of Asia. Thank you for your feedback. I'm fairly certain you are not referring to Singapore but it is our duty to clarify this on a public platform. I am sorry you did not have a positive experience in your country's T-Systems company. We do note your comments and we will certainly try to do better as a company group. You are more than welcome to apply for roles in other T-Systems organisation in another country. I'm not sure which T-Systems country you are from but we will learn from this review and highlight the lessons learnt to our own leadership team. Your HR Biz Partner (Singapore)
2.0
Nov 29, 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

How you feel working at T-Systems Košice depends heavily on which department and team you work for. Some of them are walk in a park, other are just horrible. They are hiring frequently so it's not a problem to start working there right after you graduate (and even before that). When I started, they offered a 3 month intensive Cisco CCNA (industrial level) certification course before the interview and if you were hired afterwards, you didn't have to pay for it - for those that wanted to do networking (and for some reason weren't able to study it ) it was a great opportunity. From what I've heard later though, they changed it so you'd get this kind of a course during your probation period, althought you'd only get an "internal" certificate afterwards, not the(globally accepted) industrial one. Other pros of working there would heavily depend on which department/team you got into, but from the more general pros it would mostly be: - reasonably well equipped office spaces - not too crammy, no cubicles, teams sitting together as much as possible, clean etc. - stable work (in comparison to smaller local employers in Slovakia). If you're struggling at your position they try to help you first or you can change(to some extent) to a different career path. You would have to seriously mess up several times in a short time period for them to lay you off. - customizable benefit package

Cons

It was my first job after university, so I didn't know what and where I was getting into and I remember not caring about it too much (looking back, that was a serious mistake). So, in short I ended up in that horrible part. My first job there was to prepare ITIL tickets(although I had a fresh CCNA and quite nothing regarding ITIL) for upgrading company's network switching hardware in their German datacenters as a part of an ongoing effort to revise and possibly lower their count. Everything would be going ok, if it weren't for a fact, that in the effort of gaining customers (and possibly pulling them away from the competition), T-Systems had agreed on contracts that promised 24/7 up-time for all of the hardware under their administration, 365 days a year. They somehow forgot though that when doing an OS upgrade on a switch, traffic going through has to go down for like 5 minutes when it restarts. Since there were like 100-1000 devices connected to each of those switches and they belonged to several different customers(i.e. other companies), imagine the chaos, stress and the attitude of some of their managers, when you call them that their connected hardware is going to lose the connection for 5 minutes during midnight hours. We ended up having to haggle for weeks between us and our customers as well as between several of our customers together when those 5 minutes of downtime would be possible(you can imagine the most frequent response) all the while the project was getting more and more behind schedule. Also, let me mention that a lot of those switches(and devices on them) were several years old(more on this later) and until this project started, there was no complete and updated database of exactly what these machines were and what is connected to them. We were stumbling upon things like 15-year old switches that still had some customer traffic going through them, but there wasn't anyone working at the company anymore, who would have access. There were 3 separate databases of all the T-Systems hardware but they were only partial and (as we have found) quite incomplete. Missing and old data, missing devices, devices that were in the databases but we found they are long gone, devices with no data(but with some unknown traffic going through) that weren't in any of databases etc. After a half year with these upgrades I changed my position to something more technical - firewall administrator for the company's devices segment. Although I was trained for switches, I welcomed it and learned a lot from my older colleagues in this new team. But, the main problem here was that we were 10 admins for like 100 firewall nodes located all over the world, so us newcomers were able to learn only when there was time(which was rare) and even then it had to be quick. We were severely understaffed and although our team manager did what he could, we waited for almost a year for "reinforcements" or some (much needed) training (because apparently our branch as a whole had overspent it's training budget the year before). Above I mentioned old hardware. Well, here the situation was even more bizarre. Pretty much all our devices were so old that their vendor had stopped officially supporting them long ago and because of an ever-present focus on spending less coming from our higher management, we were forced to configure them with way more stuff they were designed to handle (i.e. they would seriously struggle with that amount of VLANs even if they were new). I estimate that over 90% of all incidents we had to solve during the time I worked there were caused by old, severely overloaded hardware. When we reported it up the chain, management in Germany refused to give any budget for really solving the problem, even for buying newer models of the same device model line that would be able to handle the load. In desperation, our management in Slovakia tried a complete reorganization of firewall teams, but the requirement from Germany was that it has to be done while maintaining full operation capacity! Naturally, such thing would lead to dissolution of teams and collectives that formed over a long-years of battling stress together every day, so I really wonder how they managed to pull it off(I left just before that happened). There were even more absurd issues. For instance, we didn't have complete admin access to around 20 firewalls in Germany, because German laws (reportedly) prohibits that. However, a year before T-Systems reportedly laid off like a thousand of their employees in Germany, moved all their workload to us in Slovakia and for us it meant that whenever a German firewall node went down and became stuck, to repair it we required low-level access. We had to contact a (!single!) person there to wake up(since these things happened mostly at night) and insert his access code, so we could make repairs. However, that person wasn't required (by contract or any suchthing) to respond immediately like we were, so we ended up in high-level incident calls during the whole night waiting until he turned his phone on in the morning. One day during winter, our manager(great guy by the way, he was one of the main reasons we were holding it despite all those problems) mentioned something about acquiring a pretty big customer(like Fortune-500 big) because we reportedly offered (among other things) cheaper price in cloud services. This new customer was supposed to be implemented until September. Days and months went by and everyone forgot about it. In last 2 weeks of August(!) our manager came from a meeting saying: "Remember that big customer we supposed to have fully going by September? Looks like they just started deploying the infrastructure for him and they want us to dedicate some people to be exclusively available 24/7 as cloud firewall specialists for the next two weeks so they would be able to get customer deployed on schedule(that schedule pretty much hasn't changed since winter). So, understaffed as we were already, most of us untrained in cloud firewall deployment(only 4 people had !some! experience with it), were to support such a massive operation that had to be done in just two weeks and the (mostly foreign) part of the management was still thinking it can be done in time(until they realized in the end it couldn't). I mean, we tried as much as we could, but seriously, what the hell they've been doing all those months before August? This is just a small part of what was happening in our T-Systems branch but again, I say it really depends on where in T-Systems Košice you'd end up. I ended up in the "bad" part and I remember often wondering how on Earth this company still has any customers. After this experience I completely lost interest in networking and left, making a rule for myself that I'll never work for IT company employing more than 10 people. The only two things that kept me there for that long was my initial interest and absolutely amazing colleagues in former "AdminLAN Firewall" team. Thanks you all, your ever-present humour along with hard-working and sincere attitude was the only thing keeping the team (and probably the company) afloat.

4.0
Nov 23, 2017

Great place to Work

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

1) Upcoming with lesser employees, good for capable individual's growth. 2) Easily accessible leadership team 3) Ready to try out innovative thinking 4) Pay wise on level with competitors

Cons

1) Need for flexible working options. 2) HR Policies needs more thinking 3) More collaboration with T-systems international @ mid level management needed

Viewing 121 - 123 of 2,261 Reviews

Glassdoor has 4,329 T-Systems reviews submitted anonymously by T-Systems employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if T-Systems is right for you.