Pearson Development Editor reviews

3.2

41% would recommend to a friend

(100 total reviews)
avatar

Omar Abbosh

8% approve of CEO

42% positive business outlook

Development Editor employees have rated Pearson with 3.2 out of 5 stars, based on 100 company reviews on Glassdoor. This indicates that most Development Editor professionals have a good working experience there. Pearson is rated in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) by Development Editor professionals compared to other employers within the Audiovisual y medios de comunicación industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

100 reviews
4.0
May 21, 2018

Great people

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Ability to work from home Opportunities to learn Nice coworkers Understanding managers Good benefits Opportunities for overtime Hardly ever more than 40 hours per week

Cons

Not a lot of upward mobility Gets a little repetitive and boring Many tasks are more secretarial than editorial Projects may shift very suddenly

3.0
Mar 29, 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- In my experience, the strength of Pearson is that it allows you to work with complete ownership. - Your equation with your manager defines your appraisal. - Unlike many other publishing houses, Pearson is tech driven.

Cons

-The company is weak when it comes to providing appropriate training and knowledge transfer so I would say it is not the best for freshers. -Processes are poorly defined, too many platforms to juggle and work with add to the work pressure -Unfair work division as Assistant Editor, Associate Editor and Development Editor have exactly the same responsibilities. -Growth is slow.

Viewing 43 - 45 of 100 Reviews

Glassdoor has 9,535 Pearson reviews submitted anonymously by Pearson employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Pearson is right for you.