Marsh reviews

3.9

76% would recommend to a friend

(3,672 total reviews)
avatar

John Doyle

89% approve of CEO

67% positive business outlook

Marsh has an employee rating of 3.9 out of 5 stars, based on 3,672 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Marsh employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Seguros industry (3.6 stars).

Reviews by job title

4K reviews
3.0
Jun 4, 2020

Average - Fiduciary

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Ambience, Colleagues, Facilities, Monthly activities

Cons

Management No Proper BCP Plan and Future by the Management No proper recognition to the Deserving employees

1.0
Mar 10, 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Overall benefit package is fairly competitive i.e. pension, car allowance, holidays, PMI etc. Colleagues you work with all try their hardest despite significant shortcomings from management. There are still some great people there.

Cons

Company obsession for NOI / EBIT is a likely harbinger for disaster MFP was created predominately from the takeover over of Jelf Financial Planning (JFP). JFP was a well-regarded Wealth Management business, endorsed by client service accolades alongside an experienced and capable Adviser Team, many of whom were Chartered, underpinned by an effective and energetic Management and Support Team. Clients were genuinely front and center of the overall advice and service proposition. Since Mercer took over, it’s reasonable to say that the Financial Planning business has taken a major backwards step. The underlying reason has been poor management – harsh but fair. Most of the current Management are from the pre RDR world, with very limited technical knowledge & know how, which negatively impacts the business’s decisions & direction, but also their ability to deliver effective coaching and development. A significant number of the Advisers & Support Team members have chosen to leave the business over the last 3.5 years, c19 Advisers have left, with a similar number of experienced Support staff. Client Service has understandably suffered, Advisers regularly wait months for a financial report. Admin errors, mistakes and complaints are endless. The Client investment offering is due to take a major step back, with a new CIP effectively creating a ‘SJP’ style vertically integrated business, which will see Mercer Funds having to be recommended first and foremost due to the additional revenue earned from these funds alongside the advice fee. A CIP with such a restrictive approach is understandably a red line for most Adviser who want to ensure they can provide best advice for their clients. New Business targets & focus has increased considerably, driven by short term profit / NOI demands from the business, which has resulted in a perception that existing clients are secondary. Completing such new business targets will be ‘challenging’ given the headwind of Support issues. The remuneration scheme contains a significant ‘holdback’ element of 50%, which is subjective in its payment / release, and is heavily dependent on revenue results.

2.0
Mar 6, 2020

Average

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Decent vacation time and a cafeteria onsite

Cons

Lack of upward mobility/promotions, below market salary, low raises

Viewing 562 - 564 of 3,672 Reviews

Glassdoor has 4,726 Marsh reviews submitted anonymously by Marsh employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Marsh is right for you.