Hearst reviews

3.6

64% would recommend to a friend

(1,450 total reviews)

Steven R. Swartz

72% approve of CEO

52% positive business outlook

Hearst has an employee rating of 3.6 out of 5 stars, based on 1,450 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Hearst employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Audiovisual y medios de comunicación industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

1K reviews
2.0
Feb 2, 2012

Clueless Middle Management

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

If you are just starting out in the business then working for Hearst is a great way to gain some experience, but for a long term career path look elsewhere. Competitive salary Nice building, On-site Gym / Wellness center

Cons

It was a great place to work at one time (pre tower). Editorial /Production middle management is completely clueless as to the daily operation and the strengths and pitfalls of the magazines they are suppose to support. While the editorial workflow looks good on paper, the execution is poor due to insufficient training, a lack of enforcement of basic procedure and management’s ignorance that there is even a problem. I have never seen an operation that was run so haphazardly. Advancement within the company has more to do with personal relationships rather than achievement. Employees who offer concerns or insight are often ignored or worse put their jobs at risk. For hours worked exceding 40 in a given week there is no overtime pay for many, which depending on the individual employee may or may not be in violation of the FSLA which generaly states that exempt employees must meet certain conditions to be considered exempt. Salaried employees are not excluded from protection under this act. Management has scaled back the workforce in some very labor intensive areas while others who are underwhelmed fly under the radar. I will agree with another reviewer that there are several very toxic people in middle management with questionable ethics that need to go.

1.0
Dec 12, 2011
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Other than the fact that there is nowhere else to work in the country, there are no good reasons.

Cons

Incompetence. The selling out of journalistic integrity and credibility to the highest bidder. Forcing people to do the work of 3 employees. Refusal to pay overtime, but expecting employees to do 3 times the work in the same time. Every employee is a marketing professional regardless of job title or description. Unethical practices. Low journalistic standards. Employees treated like disposable robots.

4.0
Jun 11, 2011
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Hearst Newspapers reporting group is a great group to work for. The team is very friendly and family oriented. The office/cubice area is bright and everyone has a great sense of humor which helps you get through the work. If you can embrace an environment where there are constantly shifting priorities, you will gain invalualbe skills in managing your time and learning to how to convey your value to an organization even if its less tangible than it would be at other organizations.

Cons

The environment can be challenging at times only because management shifts priorities on a near daily basis making it difficult to complete a task from start to finish and also making it difficult to assess your personal contribution. This is a problem at many companies, one that you either embrace (see Pros) or let it sink you. If you don't like this kind of environment, then stay away, you will either hate and quit or fail and get fired.

Viewing 400 - 402 of 1,450 Reviews

Glassdoor has 1,767 Hearst reviews submitted anonymously by Hearst employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Hearst is right for you.