Elsevier reviews

4.0

79% would recommend to a friend

(2,182 total reviews)

Kumsal Bayazit

91% approve of CEO

76% positive business outlook

Elsevier has an employee rating of 4.0 out of 5 stars, based on 2,182 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Elsevier employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Audiovisual y medios de comunicación industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

2K reviews
2.0
Apr 22, 2011

My experience was not good

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Some smart and experienced people work there in scattered pockets. If you work there, seek them out to survive.

Cons

High-school behavior: favoritism, gossip, backstabbing, talking and texting during meetings. Could have been team specific. Too much outsourcing and offshore development that results in inferior work product due to communication and distance problems. Constant shifting of priorities wastes time and reduces work output.

1.0
Apr 19, 2011
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Overall, publishing is a very dynamic field undergoing tremendous changes, and as one of the biggest players in the field, Elsevier is uniquely suited for someone wishing to learn the ropes. The London office is relatively laid back and they are fairly flexible to accommodate specific working arrangements as circumstances demand.

Cons

Where to start? Overall, there seems to be very little regard for employees. I have worked there for over six years (and am currently freelancing for them, although not for much longer), and the contempt with which employees are treated beggars belief. Departments are made redundant at a moments notice and salaries are kept at a ridiculously low level, while senior management continues to engage in charades about 'valuing our people'. Employee opinions are frequently sought to asses the lay of the land (i.e. the levels of dissatisfaction), but very little - if anything - ever comes of it and as job security has become increasingly volatile, I would venture to guess that there is a certain amount of knowledge that people surveyed in January won't be around by July. The hiring policy seems very erratic and training is almost non-existent. Rather than designating a senior member of staff or manager to the training of new employees, newcomers are usually left to their own devices or are trained by editorial assistants or whoever happens to pass by when help is needed. An incredible amount of time is wasted on providing "soft" skills (such as negotiation, time management or how to reduce stress), whereas actual training to do one's job does not happen in any way worth mentioning. Obviously, with the publishing industry in flux, it is difficult to maintain those intangible benefits that have defined publishing (such as attending author events, etc.), but while no efforts has been made to motivate staff by raising salaries appreciably, all other benefits have been reduced to a bare minimum and editorial work at Elsevier has deteriorated to a sausage factory where metrical targets have superseded any kind of concern for the finished product, the customer, or the author. With outsourcing to India taking up momentum, most tasks that made editorial fun and interesting have now been sent off-shore, while the drudge has been left for the UK staff, who conveniently double as a white-faced facade for a 'respectable' publishing business rooted in Europe/the USA.

4.0
Apr 18, 2011
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

It is a rewarding career

Cons

It is a political environment

Viewing 2155 - 2157 of 2,182 Reviews

Glassdoor has 2,527 Elsevier reviews submitted anonymously by Elsevier employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Elsevier is right for you.