Elsevier reviews

4.0

79% would recommend to a friend

(2,189 total reviews)

Kumsal Bayazit

90% approve of CEO

75% positive business outlook

Elsevier has an employee rating of 4.0 out of 5 stars, based on 2,189 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Elsevier employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Audiovisual y medios de comunicación industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

2K reviews
2.0
May 2, 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good work life balance Ability to work from home

Cons

Team members are mostly contractors based abroad, which makes it difficult to collaborate and practices like pair programming are nonexistent. This is probably just down to luck based on the team you join, as I know this experience isn't universal across the company. Low pay rises, bonus isnt competitive. Oxford offices are hideous, and have terrible facilities (e.g. There's no food options nearby so your only option is the canteen which is overpriced and of terrible quality).

avatar
Elsevier Response
7y
Thank you for your review. We sometimes use contractors due to project peaks. At Elsevier, we encourage collaboration across locations because it allows us to bring varied talents together, and it helps us to further develop a pool of different skills and knowledge. We offer a competitive salary and great benefits package. Most of the reviews on Glassdoor left by our employees located in our Oxford office about our facilities are positive.
1.0
Apr 12, 2019

Underpaid, overworked, poor management decisions

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Working specifically for The Lancet group of journals can be a good experience, especially given the passionate, smart, and hardworking people who populate the various roles that get the journals to press.

Cons

The editorial roles at The Lancet journals are underpaid given how well qualified and experienced staff are expected to be (and certainly underpaid compared with most high-profile competitors in London and elsewhere). Additionally, very poor management decisions often leave people in middling roles shouldering the majority of the work and unable to progress, with no ability to negotiate any increase in salary. Performance-related pay is an absolute joke, with a forced curve that leaves many of the hardest working people receiving annual real-terms pay cuts, with novelty targets valued much more highly than the actual work involved in maintaining quality output. Meanwhile self-confidence is valued much more highly than skill or experience in promotion and hiring decisions.

5.0
Mar 27, 2019

Great place to work

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Lots to learn, flexible and open environment

Cons

Can feel too big at times, keeping track of people from different parts of the org can get overwhelming

avatar
Elsevier Response
7y
Thank you for your review.
Viewing 319 - 321 of 2,189 Reviews

Glassdoor has 2,534 Elsevier reviews submitted anonymously by Elsevier employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Elsevier is right for you.