Concentrix reviews

3.9

76% would recommend to a friend

(44,699 total reviews)
avatar

Chris Caldwell

86% approve of CEO

71% positive business outlook

Concentrix has an employee rating of 3.9 out of 5 stars, based on 44,699 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Concentrix employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Tecnologías de la información industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

45K reviews
3.0
Dec 3, 2021

Started out great but started showing cracks

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Friendly people - Sometimes the projects are interesting -Ability to take on more responsibility

Cons

Since the acquisition by Concentrix things changed a lot. There seemed to be a push for Tigerspike to do more consulting type work and engage more with Concentrix. Much more offshoring of resources. The projects I worked on were interesting but they were usually bogged down by politics and just doing whatever the client wanted us to do. A massive exodus of talent which left the people who remained picking up the pieces and doing x2 workload. The company struggled to sell any new projects which was demoralising. Most of the UK and Europe teams have been working on the same client for 3+ years. I wonder what would happen when that client ends the contract and goes in house. Training was supported but most of the time I'd have to self study using alternative cheaper methods than a course in order to save money. Salary was mediocre and the promotion process wasn't great either.

avatar
Concentrix Response
4y
Thank you for taking the time to leave a review - all feedback is highly valued and very much appreciated. I'm so happy to see you've rated Culture and Diversity/Inclusion so highly! We certainly appear to have this right when it comes to hiring the right people who ADD to our culture (not just "fit in") - it's continuously evolving. We have absolutely had a focus on consulting work as part of our business strategy - we want to continue to increase the value we can add to our clients (it's positive that you note that shift). We of course want to work more closely with the broader business (Concentrix) as there is strength in the shared purpose of delivering exceptional outcomes for our clients and a far richer pool of talent to help support that goal - noted that it doesn't come without its challenges with working across multiple timezones. Thanks again and all the best for the next step in your career. Cheers, Charley Rowley.
1.0
Oct 17, 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Absolutely nothing positive I can say about the company.

Cons

Unrealistic expectations, constant bullying, worst pay i have ever seen in my adult life. Extremely incompetent and micromanaging management team. Being unemployed gives you more dignity than working for this soulsucking company. It's basically working for a call center sweatshop.

avatar
Concentrix Response
4y
It's dissapointing to hear how unsatisfied you were during your time at Concentrix. Thank you for the honest and open feedback, and for allowing us the opportunity to review it and grow as a company.
1.0
Sep 25, 2021

Poorly managed company

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Colleagues were great to work with

Cons

This was a really negative place to work. The work we were undertaking started out as a 3 month temporary contract, and then manifested in to a permanent role as the scope of the work required became clear to Concentrix and the client. With this, came amazing opportunities for Concentrix in employee retention, promotion, careers, development, and absolutely none of these opportunities were seized, due to their mismanagement. The Client (can't speak to which company it is exactly) had a terrible attitude to how this work needed to be completed. They estimated it would be completed by Concentrix with 150 people, 1 month of training and 2 months of work. That was July 2020, Concentrix has lost about 70% of its starting workforce of 150, hired a bunch more in several batches, and the work is still not complete in September 2021. What was advertised as a "Data Entry" role quickly became something that involved confusing guidelines with conflicting documentation, processes that changed on a daily basis with no warning or justification, and a totally reactive approach to issues from both Concentrix and the client. This training that was provided by the client was also completely useless, and we as a cohort came in to production completing less than 30% of our work correctly. By the time the original 3 month contract had finished, due to the client shifting the goalposts on what was required of us, we had not put through a single piece of work to the standard they required, purely because they had such difficulty defining what that standard was. Our work was evaluated on a pass/fail basis by the client, but any discussions about the shortcomings of the process documentation provided to us by the client, quickly led to large-scale arguments, but ultimately it was the client that got the final say every time. This wasn't a major issue for us as employees, until an incentive system was introduced. The incentive system was made to essentially incentivise people to do more work at a higher quality. The data used to feed this incentive system was extremely unreliable (and Concentrix knew this from the beginning), and there were so many external factors (Days off, complex items to work on, quality outcome challenges, administration errors, etc) that affected people's eligibility, that the management of the incentive payments ended up being a full-time job for the Team Leaders for the first half of each month. But none of this was ever fixed, and the same problems arose at the start of the next month, and the start of the next month. The unreliability of this data means that the people completing the work, had absolutely no idea how they were going in terms of throughput, quality, common errors, nothing. Team Leaders had to go "underground" to get accurate live data for their Team members to see people's progress and give useful feedback, coaching, etc. And this was after the reporting team was doubled from 1 to 2 people, all that info was being sent upwards in the command chain to managers, the client, etc, but never ever shared with the people doing the actual work. There was very little interest from both Concentrix and the client on the integrity of the work. Concentrix just wanted to please the client, the client just wanted to meet their obligations. Calling in to question the integrity and purpose of the work we were actually doing was a totally foreign concept to anyone I discussed it with at either company. The same policy applied to promotions, usually awarded to those who kept quiet and got their work done, not those who strived to improve efficiencies and question inconsistencies. On multiple occasions, I applied for promotions for work I was already doing (mainly because no one else could on an interim basis, and Concentrix was always extremely slow to react when it came to needing to replace people, at one point having 4 of the 10 teams on the floor with no Team Leader), and did not receive the promotion. Many of my other colleagues were regarded by their peers as unquestionably the best candidate for a given role, and yet incredibly strange and inexplicable decisions were made for the eventual candidate. There were multiple people (especially women) who made complaints about harassment from certain managers/leaders that were completely ignored by HR. Even just recommendations and ideas from female leader were ignored, then the exact same recommendation would be made by a male leader, and they were praised AND promoted. I'm saying this as a male who had the luxury of being listened to a lot of the time when I spoke, whilst women more qualified and experienced than me were disregarded. Lastly, despite everything I've written above, the wage was probably the main reason people were leaving. Our client's competitors were setting up similiar projects and paying 20% more, and people were leaving Concentrix in droves for these opportunities. Even the original small group of people that were completing this work with the client were paid far more than us, which would be fine if their experience and expertise meant they were of higher value. However, the data we have from the pass/fail system that was in use showed the exact opposite, as we were completing our work with a 90%+ success rate, whilst the client was sending us back work that we had "failed", and we were successfully challenging this decision over 50% of the time. The discussion of a payrise started at the beginning of the project, and management would constantly say "we're working on it, we're fighting for it", but nothing ever changed, and people continued leaving en masse. There's so much more I want to say, but better to just leave it to these main points. It's a company devoid of culture, moments of fun in the workplace were extremely few and far between, and primarily driven by our colleagues rather than management. The management structure is bloated and it means nothing gets done. The smallest of things need approval by multiple people who really just do not care, and/or do not have time. The pay is uncompetitive in the industry, and the path to success within the company involves selling your soul a little bit more at every new level up the ladder.

Viewing 412 - 414 of 44,699 Reviews

Glassdoor has 57,447 Concentrix reviews submitted anonymously by Concentrix employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Concentrix is right for you.