I applied online. The process took 1 week. I interviewed at Rippling (San Francisco, CA) in May 2025
Interview
They are just wasting everyone's time at this point. Someone else added this experience, and my interview experience was EXACTLY like it!
My only question is, why WASTE everyone's time?
Copying the other person's post just to emphasize the point,
"
Not actually hiring, just wasting your time. They are building a tool to help with interviewing candidates, and you are a guinea pig for that. I completed their live coding interview and the interviewer scaled up the problem 3 times, and I answered all the questions, from the approach to implementation and time complexity. I followed up the next day, and they immediately sent me the copy-pasta email, saying: we regret to inform you that we have decided to move forward with other candidates who more closely match our current needs and requirements for this position.
"
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
Food delivery companies employ tens of thousands of delivery drivers who each submit hundreds of deliveries per week. Delivery details are automatically sent to the system immediately after the delivery. Delivery drivers have different hourly payment rates, depending on their performance. Drivers can take on, and be paid for, multiple deliveries simultaneously. If a driver is paid $10.00 per hour, and a delivery takes 1 hour and 30 minutes, the driver is paid $15.00 for that delivery. We are building a dashboard to show a single number - the total cost of all deliveries - on screens in the accounting department offices.
I applied online. I interviewed at Rippling in May 2025
Interview
Not actually hiring, just wasting your time. They are building a tool to help with interviewing candidates, and you are a guinea pig for that.
I completed their live coding interview and the interviewer scaled up the problem 3 times, and I answered all the questions, from the approach to implementation and time complexity. I followed up the next day, and they immediately sent me the copy-pasta email, saying:
we regret to inform you that we have decided to move forward with other candidates who more closely match our current needs and requirements for this position.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
Food delivery companies employ tens of thousands of delivery drivers who each submit hundreds of deliveries per week.
Delivery details are automatically sent to the system immediately after the delivery.
Delivery drivers have different hourly payment rates, depending on their performance.
Drivers can take on, and be paid for, multiple deliveries simultaneously.
If a driver is paid $10.00 per hour, and a delivery takes 1 hour and 30 minutes, the driver is paid $15.00 for that delivery.
We are building a dashboard to show a single number - the total cost of all deliveries - on screens in the accounting department offices.
I had previously interviewed with rippling less than a year ago and passed their technical, though I decided not to move forward in the process at the time. I tell my recruiter this, and she suggests I start over the process since it had been a while. That’s fine.
Problem is, I had the same exact question the first time. I told my interviewer this. I finished the interview and was told I had to schedule a second technical. Fine. I’m pretty positive I do well on it too, answered all questions and got on well with the interviewer. The next day, I receive a rejection email that they had moved on with candidates with a better match for the job.
Another review mentioned this, but since there are an influx of candidates with limited roles, they’ll just put as many people through the process carelessly to play the numbers game. Why did I need to do the exact same technical exercise that I had already been given, only to have to follow up with a second technical? No feedback was given, so it was a waste of time. I do believe that this reflects on Rippling’s culture directly. I wouldn’t recommend interviewing let alone working for a business with such morally questionable tactics.
Fast forward to current,