Springer Nature reviews

4.0

84% would recommend to a friend

(1,528 total reviews)

Frank Vrancken Peeters

82% approve of CEO

71% positive business outlook

Springer Nature has an employee rating of 4.0 out of 5 stars, based on 1,528 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Springer Nature employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Audiovisual y medios de comunicación industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

2K reviews
1.0
Nov 24, 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great internal resources for knowledge sharing, networking, and professional growth. Many smart, creative, helpful colleagues ready to help or talk. Opportunities given to professionals without specific experience in publishing.

Cons

Note: I was placed on "performance-based" probation 7 WEEKS after start date and TERMINATED a couple weeks after that, simply because my team is managed by a poisonous duo who effectively crushed my career at a giant publisher because they didn't like how I fit as the new hire on their team. I was told by HR upon termination that I was not being fired through any fault of my own and they would not appeal any Unemployment Insurance claim; this was delivered as a kind of apology for the behavior of my two bosses. It seems that your experience at Springer Nature is entirely dependent on whether the senior management on your team is any good, which seems to be uncommon. In my case, it was the worst management I've ever seen or been victim to in a professional environment. Vicious, intolerant, guileless, and untrustworthy. It felt like working in the USSR, except somehow an even more bitter and cynical culture/mood. To summarize my awful bosses: Remote management team, who haven't worked with others in a meaningful context in decades and don't reside anywhere near the New York offices, are straight up clueless in terms of interpersonal relationships and team-building in the workplace. They proudly convey a mean-spirited, bullying, highly micro-managerial, "discipline and punish" mindset that was explained as "old school" and "how they were brought up in the industry". I have no idea who or what school of thought they were referring to, but they regularly ridiculed the senior management from other teams for not "earning" their seniority the way it is supposed to be earned because those managers/directors had reached milestones at a younger age than they had. I could go on for a lifetime, but AVOID any role at Springer Nature that is seemingly always on job boards or, after speaking with an HR Recruiter and asking questions about the vacancy, it is a position for which they've had trouble finding the right candidate. Ask as much as you can about the composition of the team and try to get on one that isn't full of cynical "old-school" types who are protecting their tenuous, dusty hold on their respective teams until they can retire in 5-7 years. Also, the pay is quite low.

1.0
Jun 9, 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Salary on 26th of month Work from home facilities

Cons

Overall company is good, if you want to survive well and pay your bills on time but on the other hand if you want to grow and want to be technically sound then it's not the best place for you. This is not the ethical company, none of the policies made for employees, policies can be modified case to case only for company benefits. Enterprise content management called ECM, it's a miserable place to work lot of favoritism, castisism and threatening environment to work, where no ethics could work, practice M like buttering, you can not argue, speak and raise your voice against unethical culture it's more line enterprise central jail management. Egoistic environment especially with ECM practice M. HR will clap on atrocious behaviour. People within the practice do conspiracy and they will not support you internally if you can not do buttering. No Matter how great work have you delivered but if you are not in the favourite group you didn't get appriciation for your work. HR will not listen to employees if some one raise his or her voice but your manager will be informed about you and then you could be targeted individually as HR has well entwined wins with managers.

avatar
Springer Nature Response
6y
We are sorry to hear your thoughts. We do not know what prompted you to feel the way you do, but if you think sharing the same with the management will help make a difference and create a better working environment and culture, you can feel free to connect with our HR Head anytime and place you feel comfortable. We are sure that we can together try to resolve issues and create a positive change.
2.0
May 18, 2019

Pathetic

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

9-6 job environment -Great amenities -Amazing employment engagement activities -Colleagues at associate level are co-operative -On time salary -5 days working

Cons

The list is endless -The managers are highly unprofessional and unethical -Team leads are for namesake. They have hardly any authority when it comes to important decision making -No separate set of sick leaves. They make people's life hell if they go on an unplanned leave due to health reasons and expect to procure medical documents every time as proof -The assistant manager is highly indecisive and incompetent. The person hardly ever finds time to do some actual work without anyone's technical assistance and also has the audacity to put the phone on speaker and chit chat. On top of it, expects others to not use phones on the floor -None of the managers have a technical qualification suited to this industry and hence are unable to understand the gaps in the workflow and concerns of the employees regarding the process. -Favoritism and biased behavior is rampant in this team -Targets are a joke. Nobody is bothered about the un-qced quality of work. -Star awards and hats-off cards are given as per the whims and fancies of the managers -Besides, lack of integrity is at such a level that the hats-off cards are written by a single person in the name of managers. The manager writes cards himself only for his set of special people. -No transparency in appraisals. People with the same rating end up with different level of hikes in the salary. Instead of pressurizing the employees to keep their appraisals confidential, they should actually consider being fair once a while. -Despite many employees raising the above concerns, the HR doesn't seem to act on it.

Viewing 58 - 60 of 1,528 Reviews

Glassdoor has 1,715 Springer Nature reviews submitted anonymously by Springer Nature employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Springer Nature is right for you.