SLB reviews

3.9

74% would recommend to a friend

(11,644 total reviews)
avatar

Olivier Le Peuch

84% approve of CEO

60% positive business outlook

SLB has an employee rating of 3.9 out of 5 stars, based on 11,644 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The SLB employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Energía, minería e infraestructura pública industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

12K reviews
2.0
Nov 26, 2010
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Design Centre: Opportunities to network and gain experience, in previous years you could easily transfer these days they are cutting back on such travel. They want you to stay put, so make your location decision correctly. Travel: Depending on your position opportunity for travel. In the New Product Development area I have had on average 1 trip overseas and a couple trips in North America this year. See Cons Training: Lots of Opportunity for training, programs set up to progress your career quickly . See Cons Pay can be good if you work internationally, and get transferred a few times but it will always be lower than other companies for doing the same job. See Cons Get some base experience and move on don't count on too much.

Cons

In the Houston area training will not allow you to travel, they do not allow any travel for training when you are in the Houston area. All your training will be in the Houston area, usually a long drive is required at your expense and time. Training is quick nothing is really taught. Much of the training is a front, I am asked to pick training to take each year and then when I pick it the time is never right, or it is too long. They have a system set up for raises and progression but when the time comes to give it they give you next to nothing or nothing at all, using the excuse of market conditions. If Weatherford or another company does better in sales or their trend line looks better Schlumberger will lay off their employees to make their bottom line better. Layoffs are based on who is your buddy or not. In these past couple years they have been forcing vacation. They spin it off like it is saving jobs but it never does they still layoff how many they want. Vacation has to be paid no matter so it does not affect the profits over time. They force the vacation because it makes the books look good, so for example as in this November 2010 they forced vacation. This November vacation will make their profits look larger for the end of year in Dec. They hope that in the next year they will be able to absorb the opposite effect it has when everyone has already used their vacation and no one is taking it. The employee rating system for the end of the year is based on one person your manager. So if you do not get along with your manager you get a bad rating and your career is for the most part over. It can work the other way too. They pretend like their pay is above average but it actually is way below the average in the Houston area. Compared to other companies which use the same people to do the taxes Schlumberger Engineers are one of the most underpaid in the same industry. They say they have core values, but remember this is a corporation they only care about money. They give the illusion they are also in it for their people and technology but that is untrue. They have been slipping in the market in their technology but most of the people are pissed off at the company and their output for new products have dwindled. These demoralised development group has resulted in the cutback of their technology investment. Shop supplies are few and far between, no new tools are ordered and you have to use what you have on site. Everything is getting old and for the most part it is dangerous due to old equipment. QHSE is a fraud they do not understand how any tools work or about really anything. They put fresh graduates into these HSE positions who have no machinery experience or field experience. These people run around and make decisions on things which they have no knowledge of. Their decisions usually shut down or cost the company thousands of dollars in lost time. In the event there is an actual HSE problem that is serious they tend to look the other way or hide it. They only focus on events which are controllable or look good for the company image. It is Schlumberger's policy not to give any recommendations after you are employed there, they will only say that you have worked here. Kind of a name rank and serial or so.... If you saved or made the company millions one week you are the hero the next week they totally have forgotten about it. Managers come and go so you constantly have to prove yourself. Overall: Get in and get out. Get some experience and move on. If you want to make some money go into the field make sure you are well outside of North America far far away from Houston. When you are in areas like this money can be made. But like I said at first get in and get out. If you are in a design centre like me you can stay and be comfortable but remember there is no job security your number could be pulled at any time. This last layoff they got rid of people that have worked for the company for years simply because they were paid more. You save money when you fire the old guy and hire some contractor from India. Everything I have said here is true. I could go on and on but I think you will get the idea from this.

1.0
Sep 9, 2010

Company in Decline

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good for initial training, and exposure to the industry as a whole, Potential for international travel and assignments, and working with multiple nationalities

Cons

The company has been slowly and systematically been decreasing or removing benefits, health insurance options have become significantly more expensive and less comprehensive, Pensions eliminated, profit sharing decreased. Work load increased, responsibilities increased and overall respect for the employees is at an all time low. They promise chances for advancement but will not promote qualified employees to positions they want.

4.0
Jun 30, 2010

Fantastic training and career prospects

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Having worked for a multitude of Fortune 500 companies, working for SLB was a revelation. The training is superb, graduates undergo a fixed step training program and learn about all aspects of the Oilfield, whereas even mid-career hires get fantastic training. I personally had 11 weeks external training last year, the company average appears to be 4 weeks training, of your own choosing. Recognition of hard work does not seem to be a problem, just ensure that you don't expect people to give you something for nothing, if you do something good, ensure everyone knows! The company very much employs 'Type-A' personalities, so you need to be driven and motivated to work here. The career advancement opportunities are huge, with no real boundaries to where you can go. Not only this but Schlumberger is seen as one of the best places for producing quality employees, so having SLB on your resume certainly makes you attractive to other Oil & Gas companies.

Cons

There appears to be a significant difference within job satisfaction when comparing field engineers and office workers. The office guys have a much better time, more recognition and more career prospects with good health and safety measures. This does not appear to be completely similar with field workers. Remuneration is not as good as competitors, but get yourself on an IM contract and it all gets good again. Internal services such as IT are way behind the norm as all of the good people get sent to clients, the average people are left behind to run the business inside.

Viewing 427 - 429 of 11,644 Reviews

Glassdoor has 15,107 SLB reviews submitted anonymously by SLB employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if SLB is right for you.