SAS reviews

Sexist, racist and toxic. Exec band together to bully down and their product isn't nearly as good as they say it is.

Although the pros are really good there are some specific cons which need to be addressed: 1. For IC roles, growth after a certain level just stops, and management is not clear what responsibilities a Sr developer needs to perform, in order to achieve the next level 2. Many a times when things are not clear there is a clear politics at play In CI/CD one of the guiding principle is "noone is a hero", but if there is a technology change along with CI/CD, many a times the performers need to carry out regular work and also help lagging team mates. So in case there is help needed in team, it should be discussed clearly, and well accounted for during the planning. 3. Since SAS is working on latest technologies now, and SAS undertook an effort for upskilling, SAS should also raise compensation and plan for upscaling. 4. Senior resources must be kept little free so that they can take up some research items which will be fruitful for the product.