Good - Full Stack Developer Infosys Employee Review

4.0
Feb 20, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I have had a great experience working at Infosys. The company values work-life balance, and the management has been supportive of my needs and has provided me with flexible working hours and the option to work remotely, which has been very helpful. Infosys provides excellent training opportunities, and I have had the chance to improve my skills and knowledge through various training programs. The company encourages its employees to learn and grow, and it provides the resources needed to do so.

Cons

Overall, I had a good experience.

Explore other reviews about Infosys

5.0
Jun 4, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great salary, great people. LEX internal library is great.

Cons

Can not think of any cons.

4.0
Jun 10, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Job stability – Infosys is known for long-term employment and steady projects. Strong brand value – Having Infosys on your resume adds credibility and global recognition. Good learning opportunities – Access to internal learning platforms, certifications, and training programs (especially for freshers). Global exposure – Opportunities to work with international clients and global delivery teams. Structured processes – Well-defined policies, documentation, and governance. Work-life balance (project dependent) – Many teams offer reasonable working hours. Employee benefits – Health insurance, paid leaves, and wellness initiatives. Safe and inclusive workplace – Strong focus on ethics, compliance, and diversity.

Cons

Salary growth can be slow – Compensation increments may be lower compared to market standards. Limited flexibility in role changes – Internal mobility and project switches can take time. Bureaucratic processes – Decision-making can be slow due to multiple approval layers. Project allocation delays – Bench time and delayed onboarding to projects can happen. Variable learning exposure – Skill growth depends heavily on the project assigned. Less innovation in some teams – Certain projects may use legacy technologies. Onsite opportunities are limited – Compared to earlier years, onsite roles are fewer. Performance appraisal transparency – Rating systems may feel rigid or unclear.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All