Poorly structured and me-first mentality - Inside Sales Representative Infor Employee Review

3.0
Jan 10, 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Good earning opportunities if lucky with customer base / market - Good benefits

Cons

- The client / Market structure is very poorly defined; often unclear who manages which client / product - HR is a desaster, seems like they are working against their employees, not being understandable at all - Some people are kept in starter positions for as long as possible with no clear career opportunities; other times employees are put straight from a starter to a senior positions, ignoring others that were more eligible for the position - people are often hired when there is no need for them with them ending up having nothing to do or being passed around between different teams - many people in manager positions that are seniors but have absolutely no people skills

Explore other reviews about Infor

5.0
Jan 16, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

A lot of room for career growth, good people, strong leadership

Cons

At times Infor moves too quickly to launch initiatives

avatar
Infor Response
3mo
We strive to make Infor a great place to work for everyone, and to create an environment where employees can grow and thrive. We're happy to hear that your experience at Infor is a good one!
3.0
May 22, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I like working at Infor. I’ve been here for roughly five years. I enjoy the work, believe in the product, and genuinely like the people I work with and for.

Cons

There has recently been a very strong “AI-first” push across the company. To be clear, I understand the value. AI absolutely can streamline operations and free people up to focus on higher-value work. Used correctly, it’s useful. The problem is that there does not appear to be a clear or consistently enforced policy around what constitutes appropriate use versus misuse or outright abuse. There should be better guidance around where AI helps productivity, where it introduces risk (especially around company information being entered into public tools), and where the line is between use and replacement of basic job responsibilities. For example, I recently had a coworker explain that they created AI automation to read and manage their emails so they rarely have to review or respond themselves, while acknowledging things are likely missed. The same person records meetings for transcripts, leaves their laptop during the call, then relies on AI afterward to summarize what happened. At a certain point, it raises a legitimate question: are we using AI to improve productivity, or are we using it to avoid participating in the job altogether? Right now, reactions internally seem split. Some employees view this as a serious abuse of the technology, while others appear fully on board with it. That disconnect alone suggests the company needs clearer expectations and policy guidance. AI should support human judgment and critical thinking. Not eliminate the need for employees to engage in their work entirely. And how does the company determine when that is being done?

avatar
Infor Response
4w
At this time of change, growth, and continuous improvement, our employees are encouraged to speak up if they see an opportunity to make our ways of working better. Please send your feedback to myfeedback@infor.com so we can better understand your concern.
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All