Skin color bias Department - Electro-mechanical Technician Halliburton Employee Review

2.0
Apr 15, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good place to train in technical skills. Good safety awareness company. Roles were allocated accordingly to scope. Minimal ad-hoc or out of scope task.

Cons

Terrible bias toward skin color by PGL. If you get into his wrong side and didn’t bother to lick his boot. You’re going to suffer , he is going to turn in to blind eye toward your contribution, and once you make a mistake , he is going to make it a topic to get rid of you. Under constant pressure from him and have to keep your eye wide open. Maybe add one more eyes on your back. Colleague is very supportive and understand our feud , back me up always,

Explore other reviews about Halliburton

5.0
May 28, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Culture is great. Lots of opportunity to grow.

Cons

Company doesn't have work from home option.

1.0
Jun 18, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

* Strong brand recognition and opportunity to work on large-scale marketing initiatives. * Exposure to technical subject matter and cross-functional collaboration. * Good place to learn how large enterprise organizations operate.

Cons

I joined in a hybrid role where flexibility was an important factor in accepting the position and making personal life decisions. Within about a year, the organization moved to a full return-to-office model. While companies can change workplace policies, the transition felt abrupt and inconsistent in practice. A recurring challenge was that expectations around in-office presence did not always appear to match day-to-day reality. Remote participation still occurred for meetings and operational needs, which created confusion around when flexibility was acceptable and when it was not. Within my department, I also experienced challenges around communication and collaboration. Feedback on projects sometimes arrived late or only after priorities had shifted, and in some cases work was reassigned or substantially changed without clear involvement from the original contributor. Public criticism of work product without prior coaching made it difficult to improve or feel ownership over deliverables. Leadership communication during organizational changes often felt more focused on compliance than employee concerns. Employees raising questions about work arrangements sometimes perceived limited space for open discussion. Over time, the combination of reduced flexibility, inconsistent application of expectations, and limited recognition of specialized contributions negatively affected morale and trust.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All