Great Place - IT Analyst Halliburton Employee Review

3.0
May 28, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Reputation and growth are very important and available. With such a successful company, you will have opportunities at your fingertips. But it will require for you to be creative and…” “Reputation and growth are very important and available. With such a successful company, you will have opportunities at your fingertips. But it will require for you to be creative and proactive to make long lasting strides that will be acknowledged and appreciated.

Cons

Big company has its expected challanges. It is very easy to work for an…” “Big company has its expected challanges. It is very easy to work for an extented period of time and not be noticed easily. You have to make continous attempts to show your talent and that you can provide differnt benefits to the company.

Explore other reviews about Halliburton

5.0
Jun 29, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The company has great benefits

Cons

The con would be you are constantly in inclement weather.

1.0
Jun 18, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

* Strong brand recognition and opportunity to work on large-scale marketing initiatives. * Exposure to technical subject matter and cross-functional collaboration. * Good place to learn how large enterprise organizations operate.

Cons

I joined in a hybrid role where flexibility was an important factor in accepting the position and making personal life decisions. Within about a year, the organization moved to a full return-to-office model. While companies can change workplace policies, the transition felt abrupt and inconsistent in practice. A recurring challenge was that expectations around in-office presence did not always appear to match day-to-day reality. Remote participation still occurred for meetings and operational needs, which created confusion around when flexibility was acceptable and when it was not. Within my department, I also experienced challenges around communication and collaboration. Feedback on projects sometimes arrived late or only after priorities had shifted, and in some cases work was reassigned or substantially changed without clear involvement from the original contributor. Public criticism of work product without prior coaching made it difficult to improve or feel ownership over deliverables. Leadership communication during organizational changes often felt more focused on compliance than employee concerns. Employees raising questions about work arrangements sometimes perceived limited space for open discussion. Over time, the combination of reduced flexibility, inconsistent application of expectations, and limited recognition of specialized contributions negatively affected morale and trust.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All