Best recruiting firm to work for in the country! - Producing Director Adecco Employee Review

5.0
Feb 10, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Supportive management team, that invests heavily in their teams. There is a good balance between performance goals and accountability in a way that empowers their teams to be effective. At Adecco, they specialize in Verticals i.e Manufacturing and Technology, as opposed to department segments, like accounting and finance, or marketing. At Adecco, a recruiter can work any position from an entry level operator all the way to an executive position. That means each company only has one point of contact which our clients prefer. Also, we are not stuck only in regions, so although I'm based in Orange County, If I client has a role in another state, I can not only work it, but also bring on the team in that city to help. This has made it much more lucrative to work at Adecco than at other recruiting firms. Lastly, the fees are the most competitive. They offer a Draw plan, that pays a commission of 40,50 & 60% or a salary plan that pays at 10,15, or 20%. In addition, managers also get a generous override as well.

Cons

It's like a billion-dollar start-up, because Search is new. The team has scaled over 200% in the last 2 years, so they are still building out some of the foundational tools needed. Regardless this has not hindered my ability to make great money in a supportive team

Explore other reviews about Adecco

5.0
Jun 23, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Easy interview process, fair pay, good remote work

Cons

contract was short term, which was okay for me but might not be what everyone wants

1.0
Mar 27, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Onboarding for new hires was smooth

Cons

My experience with Adecco Staffing Agency reflects a significant disconnect between the expectations set during onboarding and the reality of assignment execution. There appears to be a consistent misalignment between candidate skill sets and the roles they are placed into, which not only undermines performance but also creates unnecessary inefficiencies for both the employee and the client organization. Assignments are often presented without full transparency regarding scope, schedule, or operational requirements, resulting in frequent adjustments that disrupt workflow continuity and personal planning. Additionally, there is a notable deficiency in accurate and timely reporting. Communication regarding assignment details, schedule changes, and performance expectations lacks consistency and clarity. This creates ambiguity in accountability and limits the employee’s ability to effectively manage deliverables. From a process standpoint, this reflects weak coordination and insufficient control mechanisms within their staffing and reporting systems. Most concerning is the apparent lack of advocacy for the employee. A staffing agency should function as an intermediary that ensures alignment between employer needs and employee capabilities while also safeguarding fair treatment and clear communication. In this case, there is a perception that employee concerns—particularly those related to schedule changes, workload expectations, and workplace conditions—are not adequately addressed or escalated. This ultimately results in a work environment that feels transactional rather than supportive, with limited consideration for employee well-being or long-term success.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All