Take it with a grain of salt and decide for yourself. - Senior Contact Center Specialist AIG Employee Review

1.0
Feb 5, 2009
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

In my opinion, the best reason to work for Allstate would be the benefits. The profit sharing plan within the company is a very good one, granted to make it really pay off, you need to do your homework and invest wisely. Also they offer a wide variety of options to choose from when it comes to medical insurance, so that you can tailor the amount of coverage you need to YOURS and your family's needs, instead of just shoving everyone under one blanket plan. Dental, Vision, Life Insurance for both you and your dependents, Long Term Disability, Group Legal and the ability to purchase additional days off are done yearly. They also offer a pretty competitive Paid Time Off (PTO) Bank, depending upon the amount of time you have been employed there. PTO combines both your vacation days and sick days, which of course must be taken into account. Another great thing about Allstate, while morale may not be up to par, the people that work within the company really are the best part of working there. Having worked in several different departments myself, I can tell you that regardless of outside factors, the people I have worked with have been top notch and a pleasure to work with.

Cons

Unfortunately, when I first started working there, I would have said that there were very few downsides to working there, however as the years passed, I was able to say this less and less. One of the major downsides for working at Allstate is that there are far too many hands in the cookie jar in far too many places, which doesn't leave much room for things to operate very efficiently. It is advertised within the company that the different departments within the company are in place to ensure that things happen more efficiently, however that leaves far too many people depending on other departments to do their job or answer any questions you may have for this to work properly. And it seems that while the company is so large, there are never enough people to allow for people to both do their job and answer the questions that need to be answered. So due to this, corners are cut, things are not properly documented, things are rushed through too quickly and end up having to be sent back due to errors and it creates mass chaos for not only that one person who cut that corner, but for everyone down the line that was/is waiting on them not now correct their error. Another thing that does not help is the time restraints that are put on processing items. The managers in these areas have lofty ideas as far as how long the turn around time should be for different items to be processed, however when there are hiring freezes, cutbacks in employees and overtime is disallowed, it makes these turn around times almost impossible to achieve. When I first started with the company, the idea was to 'exceed the expectation' and the turn around times in processing areas was a reasonable amount of time, but was almost always exceeded, leaving our customers and agents both very pleased and the employees content. Then when competitive strategy came into play and it was suddenly more about beating out the processing times of other companies, suddenly you are dealing with angry customers, agents an other in-house employees, because you aren't able to complete things in the time frame that the company as a whole is now advertising, leaving the employees completely deflated, frustrated and feeling like they can never catch up. When it comes to career opportunities, currently, there really are none in most area's due to hiring freezes. Which bring up another issue... OUTSOURCING!! While I completely understand that with the economy the way it is today, it is much cheaper and cost effective to pay someone in another country to do the same jobs that you are currently having to pay competitive salaries and wages for... HOW IS THIS HELPING THE US ECONOMY! By them taking away all of these jobs they are furthering the economy in other countries and moving several hundred 'valued employees' into the unemployment line looking for other work with potentially a limited skill set, depending on what area's of the company they have worked and what opportunities have been available to them. Personally, I currently could not recommend Allstate and it's affiliates as a good/sound place to work, because you really never know if the job you have is a secure one, or if next week they'll tell you that they have decided to 'outsource' your job.

Explore other reviews about AIG

5.0
Feb 20, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good benefits, good people in New York

Cons

Management out of touch with reality

2.0
May 28, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Salary and vacation days are good but be careful you are not taking on multiple roles for this position.

Cons

If you’re considering applying, make sure to ask in the interview: Will there be someone else doing what I am doing? If not, the team is understaffed and all the responsibility will rest on your shoulders. Even with the vacation days, your days will be swamped and stressful. It is NOT worth it. Out of curiosity, I’ve been looking at their latest job postings for my department and there is so much packed into one role, it’s wild. You can tell the person they’re trying to replace clearly wore too many hats and it will be a long struggle to fill this position. Are my team members working in other time zones? You can face several early morning calls based on their hiring pattern. Some teams will require annual or quarterly traveling. Over the years, the company is hiring mainly white managers domestically in the USA, while lower roles are hired abroad or contractors. Meetings to accomodate offshore hours are brutal. What percentage of the day is in meetings? If you don’t have time to deliver on output because of meetings, you will likely have to stay late to complete the work. The company seems to hire very good talkers but not a lot of do-ers. Several meetings involved more people than needed. Managers seem to think “if I have to suffer through this meeting, everyone has to suffer”. If managers are fortunate enough to delegate the deliverables, they can handle some meetings by themselves. Who would be handling my onboarding and training when I start? If it is not your direct manager, your early success will be at the mercy of your peers who understandably are not responsible for onboarding you. Sadly, I have observed that the people-managers do not like to manage people. In fact, they value those that manage the manager and the team’s roadmap plan for them. The managers don’t seem to want to oversee the team or their deliverables. If there is a job change (salary, position, hours) how is that communicated? In my experience these things were not communicated or consented to. The change would apply in the system and you would have to conform accordingly.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All