Where dreams go to die - Quality Control Coordinator ADP Employee Review

1.0
Aug 18, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The building is nice Adequate amount of parking Hybrid schedule

Cons

This place will suck the life out of you. They require far more than they give/deserve. They do not value their employees. They will require you to work 3 to 4 jobs minimum. The pay way below market value. We are severely understaffed. A lot of people here have to work more than one job to make ends meet. There’s a high turnover rate. The company does not care, because they lean on their name. Most times when people get a title change it’s not a promotion. It’s a lateral move. Management always conducts feedback meetings to hear from employees. They never take any of the feedback seriously to make any reasonable and adequate changes. Most of us are burnt out and are looking for other opportunities. This company used to garner the loyalty from its employees by being lifers. Now the average person stays two years. There’s a reason for that.

avatar
ADP Response
1y
Thank you for sharing your review and rating with us on Glassdoor. We appreciate your insights and encourage you to reach out to your leaders or site HR team and discuss the details of your feedback so that we may address them and make sure they receive the right attention and action.

Explore other reviews about ADP

5.0
Jun 16, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great pay, good work life balance

Cons

Hard work but worth it

2.0
Jun 15, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Established company with a long history and relatively stable business operations. - Provides a sense of job stability compared to many organizations navigating rapid changes in the current AI-driven market. - Lower risk of frequent restructuring or large-scale layoffs than many high-growth technology companies. - Opportunity to work with experienced employees who have deep institutional and domain knowledge. - Predictable work environment that may appeal to individuals seeking long-term stability over rapid change. - Strong choice for professionals who value job security and a steady career path in an uncertain economic climate.

Cons

- Documentation is limited or rusted, and many operational processes lack clear runbooks or standardized procedures, making onboarding and troubleshooting more difficult than necessary. - If you're coming from a modern, fast-paced engineering environment, the organization may feel behind current industry practices and tooling. - Internal politics can sometimes outweigh technical merit or execution. - There are teams with very long-tenured employees where change and innovation can be difficult to drive. - Decision-making often involves multiple layers of approval, resulting in significant bureaucracy and slower execution. - Processes can move slowly, and collaboration is not always transparent across teams, leading to inefficiencies and occasional confusion around ownership. - In some areas, roles, responsibilities, and operational processes are not clearly defined, creating unnecessary chaos and inconsistent ways of working. - Engineering standards and best practices vary considerably between teams, making cross-team collaboration challenging. - Organizational change tends to happen slowly, which can be frustrating for employees who are focused on modernization, automation, and continuous improvement.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All