Love it, but outsourcing is ruining ADP image - Implementation Consultant ADP Employee Review

5.0
Jul 11, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great company, believes in family first. People are awesome. Management getting better

Cons

Outsourcing of jobs within ADP lowers the quality of our product. Language barrier with outsourcing is crazy. ADP doesn't need to save money by outsourcing. Keep tenured people.

avatar
ADP Response
10y
Great insight. We appreciate your open and honest review and will take you suggestions about outsourcing and the changing global landscape seriously. Thank you again.

Explore other reviews about ADP

5.0
May 28, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

benefits were great and scenary

Cons

no cons during my time there

avatar
ADP Response
1w
We are glad that you enjoyed your time at ADP and appreciate the positive feedback you have shared about your experience.
2.0
Jun 15, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Established company with a long history and relatively stable business operations. - Provides a sense of job stability compared to many organizations navigating rapid changes in the current AI-driven market. - Lower risk of frequent restructuring or large-scale layoffs than many high-growth technology companies. - Opportunity to work with experienced employees who have deep institutional and domain knowledge. - Predictable work environment that may appeal to individuals seeking long-term stability over rapid change. - Strong choice for professionals who value job security and a steady career path in an uncertain economic climate.

Cons

- Documentation is limited or rusted, and many operational processes lack clear runbooks or standardized procedures, making onboarding and troubleshooting more difficult than necessary. - If you're coming from a modern, fast-paced engineering environment, the organization may feel behind current industry practices and tooling. - Internal politics can sometimes outweigh technical merit or execution. - There are teams with very long-tenured employees where change and innovation can be difficult to drive. - Decision-making often involves multiple layers of approval, resulting in significant bureaucracy and slower execution. - Processes can move slowly, and collaboration is not always transparent across teams, leading to inefficiencies and occasional confusion around ownership. - In some areas, roles, responsibilities, and operational processes are not clearly defined, creating unnecessary chaos and inconsistent ways of working. - Engineering standards and best practices vary considerably between teams, making cross-team collaboration challenging. - Organizational change tends to happen slowly, which can be frustrating for employees who are focused on modernization, automation, and continuous improvement.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All