GREAT Training, but Low Pay and Lack of Internal Organization Fails the Reps and Customers - District Sales Manager Major Accounts ADP Employee Review

3.0
Feb 15, 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Upward mobility, stock purchase plan, benefits, lax PTO model if you have a good manager, ability to sell 40+ products and solutions to a broad customer base, lots of tools and resources. Good work/life balance.

Cons

Low base salary, reps are selling non-contractual agreements to clients, so if the client terminates, changes products, etc. within 6 months (happens often) it negatively impacts the sales associates commission and quota, even though it is not the sales rep's responsibility to maintain the client after the sale. Lots of internal competition and sales disputes (reps fighting with other reps, inside sales vs outside sales). ADP's large breath of services require an "agnostic" selling approach, but because the reps are all "specialized" in different products, the sales process often requires bringing in 3+ reps all offering a different product/solution to the same prospect, making the process convoluted for the prospect and the reps - often causing internal disputes, an unorganized selling strategy and lost deals. ADP prides itself in having these "specialized" reps that pigeonhole them into specific products and company sizes but also preach an up-selling/cross-selling mentality encouraging reps to sell outside of their "specialized" sector - which is great for selling scope but ultimately causes internal disputes. For example, you run an entire process from start to finish - if you happen to sell something that isn't technically "your specialty" you are required to cut in a rep that had no part in the process. The reps are all capable of the cross selling, but the unnecessary segmentation of roles cause major issues internally and externally. They also have “hunter” roles and “specialty” roles, the specialty roles are meant to be 100% referral-based roles, meaning reps can only gain business from Brokers, CPAs, Banks, etc. When you’re interviewing the roles will be explained as warm referral sources – but they’re all extremely cold, and the “partnerships” presented are loose or non-existent. Forcing reps to spin their wheels on building referring partnerships that typically take 1+ years to develop and then putting the reps on plan for not bringing in new business. Ultimately, it’s the lack of organization and unnecessary segmentation for roles/products that make this an extremely difficult company to work for.

avatar
ADP Response
4y
Thank you for taking the time to share your feedback. We appreciate hearing from current associates and will share your insights with our leadership teams.

Explore other reviews about ADP

5.0
Jun 17, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

work life balance continued education opportunity

Cons

segmented internal departments some unreasonable client escalations

2.0
Jun 15, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Established company with a long history and relatively stable business operations. - Provides a sense of job stability compared to many organizations navigating rapid changes in the current AI-driven market. - Lower risk of frequent restructuring or large-scale layoffs than many high-growth technology companies. - Opportunity to work with experienced employees who have deep institutional and domain knowledge. - Predictable work environment that may appeal to individuals seeking long-term stability over rapid change. - Strong choice for professionals who value job security and a steady career path in an uncertain economic climate.

Cons

- Documentation is limited or rusted, and many operational processes lack clear runbooks or standardized procedures, making onboarding and troubleshooting more difficult than necessary. - If you're coming from a modern, fast-paced engineering environment, the organization may feel behind current industry practices and tooling. - Internal politics can sometimes outweigh technical merit or execution. - There are teams with very long-tenured employees where change and innovation can be difficult to drive. - Decision-making often involves multiple layers of approval, resulting in significant bureaucracy and slower execution. - Processes can move slowly, and collaboration is not always transparent across teams, leading to inefficiencies and occasional confusion around ownership. - In some areas, roles, responsibilities, and operational processes are not clearly defined, creating unnecessary chaos and inconsistent ways of working. - Engineering standards and best practices vary considerably between teams, making cross-team collaboration challenging. - Organizational change tends to happen slowly, which can be frustrating for employees who are focused on modernization, automation, and continuous improvement.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All