Criteo reviews

3.9

73% would recommend to a friend

(1,430 total reviews)
avatar

Michael Komasinski

39% approve of CEO

47% positive business outlook

Criteo has an employee rating of 3.9 out of 5 stars, based on 1,430 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Criteo employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Tecnologías de la información industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

1K reviews
1.0
Apr 17, 2022

Don't recommend to work here

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Flexible working time and good insurance

Cons

the management sucks. Play politics. Force me to resigned other than pay for the retrench allowance.

avatar
Criteo Response
3y
Thank you for taking the time to sit and share. ​ We strongly believe that managers should lead by example, which is why we are deeply sorry to hear about your experience. We leave the door open to feedback during our pulse surveys for our HR team to jump in if there is a need to preserve our employees' best interests.​ We wish you all the best in the pursuit of your career.
2.0
Feb 14, 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Criteo is tech focused and the engineers are the stars here. * The management is somewhat open to change * Company values diversity * OK compensation * Very good work life balance * Paid overtime * Varied tech stack (c#, java, scala, kotlin, python, ruby) so you'll find a match * OK place to start your career

Cons

Coming from a FAANG company due to family reasons, I was shocked at the diversity of engineer skills here. You can see one skilled and enthusiastic engineer, and a staff/senior engineer that shouldn't even be hired as an intern. Though rarely, I've also encountered people in high tech positions that don't speak English very well. It's a mixed bag. The company is very bureaucratic and slow; even small projects require several meetings in which some people's opinions matter more than others. The kickoff meetings are a joke, people just want to state things to sound smart and they block you in the process. The codebase is very low quality, there's no coding standard, and the high number of supported languages doesn't help. When a feature is replaced, the old code doesn't get deleted, the migrations don't get done to completion, and the code grows and grows over time, becoming more fragile at each iteration. Then you find yourself reading code that's not even used anymore, because it turns out that the code you're reading was there just to support one project that prevented some migration from going complete in 2018 and it was decommissioned in 2020, but no one bothered to clean it up. If you're coming from FAANG, don't make same the mistake I've made. Your skills won't be appreciated here and you'll struggle trying to be productive.

avatar
Criteo Response
3y
Hi, my name is Maxime Brugidou, Engineering Director. Thank you for taking the time to share such detailed feedback. I am sorry to hear you are not making the most out of your experience with us though. We highly promote a bottom-up approach and open feedback culture, so we can fix problems as we go. We strongly encourage innovation internally, with initiatives such as 10% projects, or the Voyager program. Project management is an area of constant improvement, and we are determined to make processes quicker and smoother as we evolve. The Kick-off process, for instance, is constantly improving - there is even a guild dedicated to this process (with a healthy mix of ICs, leads, managers, TPMs, etc.) We also intend for the process to be largely asynchronous - most of the discussion should have already happened in Confluence before the meeting even takes place. If you feel the process is too slow, perhaps getting involved in the guild could be a smart way to help improve it. We are a large engineering organization, with a diverse codebase, and a mix of legacy along with new stacks that we have to maintain. We acknowledge that the quality may vary from one project to the other, as we must keep making pragmatic trade-offs. We do focus on cleaning and deleting old projects, and actively reducing debt across the organization. I can assure you this is something top management is aware of and supports. Our people come from all over the world, so I guess encountering various accents and speaking levels is part of the deal. We see diversity as a real strength, and we are proud of the hiring bar we work with to ensure we hire the best people around the globe. We are constantly challenging and improving our hiring and performance evaluation processes to hire and retain the best diverse engineers while remaining people-centric and providing growth opportunities.
5.0
Jan 17, 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The culture at Criteo is amazing. Working on the sales team is exciting and fun, and there's opportunity to make quite a bit of money in commissions. Tthere's typical bureaucracy (i.e. waiting on higher ups for approval of certain things) but you'll find that anywhere.

Cons

Not a Criteo "con" necessarily, more so just the reality of working for a truly global company can be frustrating at times as we have to consider things that don't always have a direct impact on us, i.e. Covid-19. If things are bad in one part of the world but totally normal in another, there's sometimes the chance that you will still be affected on a company wide scale.

Viewing 448 - 450 of 1,430 Reviews

Glassdoor has 2,190 Criteo reviews submitted anonymously by Criteo employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Criteo is right for you.