Amazon Engineering Program Manager II reviews

3.4

58% would recommend to a friend

(2,297 total reviews)
avatar

Andrew Jassy

32% approve of CEO

53% positive business outlook

Engineering Program Manager II employees have rated Amazon with 3.4 out of 5 stars, based on 2,297 company reviews on Glassdoor. This indicates that most Engineering Program Manager II professionals have a good working experience there. Amazon is rated in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) by Engineering Program Manager II professionals compared to other employers within the Tecnologías de la información industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

2K reviews
2.0
Apr 2, 2009
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

If you are interested in massively scalable systems, Amazon is great to understand what true scaling means. If you are early in your career, Amazon can expose you to a wide range of technologies, and give you a a lot of responsibility quickly. There will also be a lot of people like you to hang out with, develop friendships with and so on. Amazon does a lot of college hiring, so there are a lot of like minded bright people in the software engineering areas. There is an employee discount, which is nice to have. Seattle is a great area. Amazon has a lot of tools support for software engineers, and puts a lot of effort into making it easy to build, deploy and update software.

Cons

A weird mix of micro management and a demand for ownership. One of the key concepts at Amazon is that individual teams own their product/project, and the teams are encouraged to understand and drive the direction of the projects. At the same time, there are a lot of mandatory corporate initiatives that you have to do, sometimes leaving you with very little time to do the "customer-centric" things that are supposed to be the mainstay of the engineering work. There's also a lot of nit-picking and second guessing if you actually take that ownership. Almost all engineers are responsible for supporting their own software, which is supposed to encourage the building of quality software. In practice, this means that software engineers are on-call for a week, and have to get up in the night to answer any issues that come up. Not so bad if you are on a 8 person team, which means you have to do this once every two months, but really bad if you are on a 3 person team. This burns people out pretty badly, and leads to bad code - you can't focus if you were up all night. An arrogant believe that Amazon engineers are better than almost anywhere else. I've worked at a lot of good companies, and while the new college hires are natively bright and talented, many of them are inexperienced. Amazon doesn't seem to have a lot of engineers with 10-12 years of experience, who could grow the skills of these talented newbies. I've been in places with much better engineers. But I've heard Amazon middle management claim that they can pull off extremely ambitious schedules because they have Amazon engineers. Pressure.... pressure .... pressure. A lot of demands, a lot of context switching, and a lot of statements that imply that you need to step it up and deliver.

3.0
Aug 17, 2008
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The opportunity to work on projects that have great impact both internally and externally. Ability to move around the business and not get pigeonholed into a particular function/job. Should be a more formal process... People think you work at a great company and are very impressed when you tell them you work at Amazon...that is unless they know better. (i.e. ex-Amazonian or know someone at Amazon)

Cons

Lack of work/life balance. Burnout is the order of the day here. You are considered a slacker or not committed, if you work 40 hours on a regular basis. The benefits are average. They are not comparable to Microsoft's coverage. The compensation and stock grants could also use a boost. Heavy reliance on the stock grants in lieu of salaries. This weighs heavily on their retention problem. People are leaving left and right. They bail as soon as their stock vests, if not sooner. Their selection and development of the management team is a bit scary. Some people should not be managers. What criteria is used to promote people into a manager role?...Communication across the company sucks...little documentation, lack of formal processes, training etc. Too much focus on metrics and goals in each siloed department. Groups that work closely together are at odds with each other because their metrics and goals conflict with each other.

Viewing 2296 - 2297 of 2,297 Reviews

Glassdoor has 250,418 Amazon reviews submitted anonymously by Amazon employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Amazon is right for you.