The overall process is very tailored and exercises that cut to the chase and really check for the required expertise for the role. No puzzles, algorithms, or take-home exercises, respects candidates' time.

The interview process was three steps, within a one-two weeks difference between them. - System design. A well-driven discussion about how things can be done, always discussing pros and cons. - Live coding. Few exercises to do very conscious with the time and difficulty. - Behavioural. General and specific questions regarding issues you might find in a daily basis.

I went through a 4 step process. The communication was excellent throughout. I got sent details about what the expect from each interview. I got given feedback at every step and usually received that on the same day I had my interview. The first interview was a 30 min conversation with Margaret who is a Tech Recruiter to go through previous experience, skills, what I'm looking for and salary expectations. The second step was a 1 hour meeting with 2 Typeformers to go through a technical approach for a design system. I thought this was a really interesting interview which allowed they to see more than just technical skill but also the ability to communicate and problem solve. At this stage I also realised that I'd be able to learn a lot at Typeform. The third was a 90 minute live coding challenge, again with 2 Typeformers. I personally don't think live coding is a way where I can really excel and show my skill level but Pablo and Jess made me feel comfortable and were really helpful. And the final interview was a behavioural one with the Jorge, Director of Software Engineering. I can definitely recommend really preparing for this interview based on the information you get sent before. I thought Jorge was really great at interviewing and playing back anything I said to make sure he understood.