Candidates applying for Analyst roles take an average of 2 days to get hired, when considering 1 user submitted interviews for this role. To compare, the hiring process at AlphaSights overall takes an average of 13 days.
Common stages of the interview process at AlphaSights as a Analyst according to 1 Glassdoor interviews include:
Phone interview: 100%
Here are the most commonly searched roles for interview reports -
The interview process was pretty harmless, beginning with the video questions and then moving onto a face-to-face video interview if chosen. The video questions themselves have all been posted here more or less and even if it seems awkward talking into a camera without an audience, it's not too bad. Everyone I'm sure is a little awkward so there's no need to worry about tripping up at the beginning or pauses.
The face-to-face interview was a little more nerve wracking, although it's also not too bad. They typically last around 45 minutes, but it's not uncommon to end earlier apparently. The questions are more to get to know you and to see if you've done your research on the company itself, so make sure you are prepared for that. In particular, the BREAD process is something that should be thought about before going into the interview.
Interview questions [3]
Question 1
What part of the BREAD process are you most excited about?
I applied through an employee referral. I interviewed at AlphaSights (Londres, Inglaterra) in Jul 2017
Interview
4 rounds of interview, including video assessment, HR interview, and case study. Straight forward questions about one's understanding of the company and role. Needed to show that I had done research on company, why they do what they do, and how I would fit into company.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
Why do you want to work for Alphasights specifically?
I applied online. I interviewed at AlphaSights in Jun 2016
Interview
I had to answer and record a series of questions over video. There was no time in between the questions and no time to prepare your answers. It did not seem like a good or accurate way of evaluating candidates.