Sage reviews

Internal politics, favoritism and cliques mar Sage's progress. Change occurs regularly at Sage. It is often experimental and poorly planned, causing stressful uncertainty for employees. Leaders are not held accountable for failures or strain on teams. Nor are they equipped with the tools/ practice to share meaningful, constructive feedback with employees. Feedback and training vary greatly person-to-person. Micromanagement and poor communication impedes success, the development of new ideas and the introduction of methodologies at Sage. Travel expectations and workload create burnout. DEI factors of individuals are weighed via an internal scorecard as a consideration for hiring/ promotions. This process lacks transparency to individuals, though reports are shared/ tracked as high-level metrics internally.

Downside of remote work is that office culture is hard to maintain. Especially as some of the old guard who worked here for decades retire and the new execs switch up how the company operates.