Pearson reviews

3.5

59% would recommend to a friend

(7,729 total reviews)
avatar

Omar Abbosh

57% approve of CEO

49% positive business outlook

Pearson has an employee rating of 3.5 out of 5 stars, based on 7,729 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Pearson employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Audiovisual y medios de comunicación industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

8K reviews
1.0
Apr 27, 2017

I wouldn't bother :(

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

There is 'some' flexibility to manage your own workload. There are still some really great people left you might be lucky enough to work with.

Cons

1. Reorganisations are common place, and happen almost every few months now. 2. Pay is laughable, it averages about 30-40% below the market average (The same role in another awarding body like C&G or AQA pays at least £5k more per year!) 3. Teams are being 'outsourced' left right and centre, mad redundant in London then recreated in significantly cheaper areas (Such as South Yorkshire, or Manilla) 4. The people with the loudest voices are often the ones that get the best deals, if you end up in a team where your manager doesn't have a 'voice' then don't expect a decent pay rise/bonus/praise for good work or a job well done 5. 2016 pay rise was 1%. Bonus was 0 because the finance team over estimated our financial targets, not by 5-10% but by a massive 25%! As a result of THEIR incompetence the entire company lost out on a bonus. 6. After the debacle in 2016 over finance targets we were told that this year would be different and the targets were 'Much lower', we still missed them massively...... Yet our CEO was given more than £345,000 (44% of his annual base salary) whilst some in the business got nothing whatsoever even though they may have 'Met' or 'Exceeded' expectations 7. 2017 pay rise was 2% (Below the current rate of inflation at the time) despite being told all that 2017 would see ‘inflation beating pay rises’ 8. If you apply for a new role within the company, you are restricted to a 10% pay rise rule – This means that if you are on £40k per year, and the salary for the new role is £45-£50k, the most you could get would be £44k. However, if the role is offered to someone external, the MINIMUM they would get is £45k 9. If you are in a position of responsibility then you will be expected to work outside of your core hours, this is absolutely expected and your manager will make your life hell if you try to only work your contracted hours 10. If you’re asked to travel for work (Between offices in the UK, overseas etc.) you are expected to travel on your own time, e.g. if you are asked to go to Manchester from London, you will be expected to travel either at 6am (train) and start work when you arrive in the office, or if you are staying overnight you will be expected to work the full day in London then travel out of hours, the same is true when you are returning 11. NOBODY has any confidence in John Fallon, in 5 years as CEO we have had 4 profit warning; our share price has been as high as £15.50 per share but under him it’s barely able to get above £6.20 now 12. The company is not willing to invest in its products, instead it brings in 3rd party companies to build a basic platform and then we have to find a way to make it work, systems like examWizard or ResultsPlus haven’t been funded for years and they’re now planning to shut down ResultPlus Direct (this is the student results access portal) because ‘it’s not that popular’. IT’S NOT POPULAR BECAUSE YOU WON’T INVEST IN IT! I could write a dozen more points to highlight why this is the last place you should work, but what’s the point!? This is a company that lost its way when they decided to sell off the FT/Penguin, a company THAT short-sighted can’t be expected to do very well, I’ll just wait for the private equity firms to come and take us over and close us down for good…..

1.0
Apr 7, 2016

Got Out Sort of In Time

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

There were and still are people at Pearson who care about making great things for teachers and students, but...

Cons

... the disastrous outsourcing model of development effectively removes that one Pro. Besides reducing head count and cutting costs, what is one other "positive" about relying on anonymous, outside developers to "author" your content? You have talented people inside (fewer by the day) being converted into vendor monitors. Why does management think outside people will work harder/better for Pearson than Pearson's own employees? It's illogical. True, Pearson had always used vendors when the amount of work required it. But, they had inside people who gave more than their all check any outside work to ensure quality for teachers and students. And Pearson used to develop core products like student books in-house as a collaborative with its authors. It's so sad how the current regime is running this once proud company into the ground. For those who soldier on, I feel for you. I did it for years. I got out while I still had some physical and mental health left. I'm glad I left even though I miss my friends.

3.0
May 21, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Coworkers and teammates are all well-qualified and hard working. Benefits and pay are very generous. The work is valuable and worth doing.

Cons

The corporate re-org shuffle is a little maddening. We have a tendency to lurch from cost-cutting measures to motivational branding and back again. There's a good chance your job will be cut or moved to offshore teams.

Viewing 46 - 48 of 7,729 Reviews

Glassdoor has 9,510 Pearson reviews submitted anonymously by Pearson employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Pearson is right for you.